User talk:Heylenny

Happy Holidays and Best Wishes For 2026 from VulcanSphere

Happy Holidays Heylenny! Vulcan Wishing A Great 2026 For You! – VulcanSphere (talk) 02:53, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

@VulcanSphere: Thx :) heylenny (^talk/_edits) 06:06, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Feliz ano novo @Heylenny! :-) VitorFriboquen :] (Talk) 22:34, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Obrigado e igualmente, Vitor. heylenny (^talk/_edits) 06:06, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Parque Nacional de Aparados da Serra (01) - Lucio Stabile.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Parque Nacional de Aparados da Serra (01) - Lucio Stabile.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Герб Башкирской АССР (1978).svg

File:Герб Башкирской АССР (1978).svg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Герб Башкирской АССР (1978).svg This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Boston Mayflower (talk) 03:15, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Category:Fora Bolsonaro 19J (2021-06-19 - Porto Alegre, Brasil)

Em vez de colocar em cada foto desta categoria a categoria June 2021 in Porto Alegre coloque a categoria Fora Bolsonaro 19J (2021-06-19 - Porto Alegre, Brasil) sob a categoria June 2021 in Porto Alegre. É mais simples, é mais prático Eugenio Hansen, OFS (talk) 11:37, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

@Eugenio Hansen, OFS: Grato pela correção. Mas o que significa esse "19J" no nome da categoria? Também, normalmente as categorias são em inglês (ver Commons:Categories#Category names). Que tal movermos para "Fora Bolsonaro (Porto Alegre, 19 June 2021)"? heylenny (^talk/_edits) 16:40, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

O evento foi divulgado com 19J. Não foi uma questãode gostar e 19J (não gosto) Eugenio Hansen, OFS (talk) 18:58, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Entendi. Pesquisei e vi o que seria esse 19J. Mas, ainda perguntando: não prefere "Fora Bolsonaro (Porto Alegre, 19 June 2021)"? Além de ser mais simples e padrão, evita confusão com esse tal 19J. heylenny (^talk/_edits) 22:44, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Como não obtive resposta, tomei a liberdade de mover a categoria conforme o escopo deste projeto. heylenny (^talk/_edits) 21:59, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chevrolet Cruze taxis, left view (Porto Alegre).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The scope should be more specific. Look at how other competitors build their scope in particular the angle of view.--Pierre André ^(talk) 11:37, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

@Pierre André Leclercq: More specific than "taxis in Porto Alegre" to represent a taxi in that city? The other images of the taxis are either in groups of several taxis, or they are blurry and poorly angled. This one is the best within the scope. heylenny (^talk/_edits) 22:19, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

• Please specify whether this is a rear, right side, left side, or front view of the car. Look at how other competitors build their scope in particular the angle of view. Thank you.--Pierre André ^(talk) 22:35, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

@Pierre André Leclercq: Tried to fix it. Please, tell me exactly what you are suggesting. Thank you. heylenny (^talk/_edits) 22:57, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

@Heylenny: , I think it's the good way Chevrolet Cruze taxis, left view (Porto Alegre). --Pierre André ^(talk) 23:35, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

@Pierre André Leclercq:  Done, but I wanted this image to represent a 'Taxi in Porto Alegre'. heylenny (^talk/_edits) 14:05, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

•  Support useful. --Pierre André ^(talk) 16:41, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:29, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:18, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Victor Meirelles – Juramento da Princesa Isabel, 1875 – Museu Imperial, Petrópolis.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Victor Meirelles – Juramento da Princesa Isabel, 1875 – Museu Imperial, Petrópolis.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Rollback right given

I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Commons:Rollback. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. Abzeronow (talk) 00:47, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

@Abzeronow: Appreciate the trust :) heylenny (^talk/_edits) 01:41, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

@Heylenny Aí sim! E parabéns pelos 100.000 edições na Commons =) VitorFriboquen :] (Talk) 22:07, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:The Beatles Abbey Road album cover.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Beatles Abbey Road album cover.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (31 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lifebuoys of Noiva do Caí II ship 20260126193158.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 14:47, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Flag of the Tuvan ASSR (1971–1978).svg

File:Flag of the Tuvan ASSR (1971–1978).svg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of the Tuvan ASSR (1971–1978).svg This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Boston Mayflower (talk) 17:43, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Requesting deleting of three useless redirect pages.

File:Flag of the Tuvan ASSR (1962–1971).svg, File:Flag of the Tuvan ASSR (1971–1978).svg and File:Flag of Tuva (1990–1992).svg These three redirect pages have no purpose and should be deleted. Boston Mayflower (talk) 17:54, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

File names: the year is bad?

Hi, I am about https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Mogilyovskiye-gubernskiye-vedomosti-20231020_125456.jpg&diff=next&oldid=1160383966

Just other files at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Mogilyovskiye_gubernskiye_vedomosti_1862 have the year in the name. Vitaly Zdanevich (talk) 09:02, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

The name you chose was already in use. heylenny (^talk/_edits) 20:08, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:27.01.2026 Abertura do Seminário da Justiça Eleitoral sobre Segurança, Comunicação e Desinformação 13.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:27.01.2026 Abertura do Seminário da Justiça Eleitoral sobre Segurança, Comunicação e Desinformação 13.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Ameisenigel.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion (shown above) or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 16:02, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Fixed @Ameisenigel: Original link may be deleted. The correct one is https://www.flickr.com/photos/tsejusbr/55064083308/in/album-72177720331690701. Thank you. heylenny (^talk/_edits) 20:06, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you, I have removed the deletion tag now. --Ameisenigel (talk) 20:14, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Issues with file renaming

Hello Heylenny, I learned that you executed file renamings that can easily be seen as controversial. I cannot understand why you used a criterion 4 rationale in Special:Diff/1161510528, as File:Patti Smith (Haldern Pop Festival 2014) IMGP4076 smial wp.jpg is totally fine according to COM:FN conventions and the footnote for the criterion itself. It's not up to you or another filemover to enforce some arbitrary naming pattern, as you did with other Haldern Pop festival images too, another example when the given filename is already good. In fact, these actions may have been an abuse of FR privileges. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 19:36, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

@Grand-Duc: Hi, my intention was to standardize the filenames within Category:Haldern Pop Festival 2014 by removing trailing elements such as "smial wp", even though the previous names were acceptable (which is why I kept the redirects). If you consider this incorrect, I can revert the renamings without any problem. heylenny (^talk/_edits) 20:01, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Please do. In fact, removing parts like "smial wp" may actually infringe upon licensing terms (when looking at Creative Commons licenses), as we've got to keep work titles intact if possible ("smial" the nickname of the author) - the FAL could be more permissible in that regard. I'm using a similar pattern (with my initials), example File:Rhönschaf-Weidberg bei Kaltenwestheim HBP-2019-04-28.jpg. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 20:15, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

@Grand-Duc I've reverted the files to their original names. Thanks for the clarification. heylenny (^talk/_edits) 20:44, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you, too! In fact, I think that FR#4 is only seldom to be used: did you see the footnote "4" affixed as explanation to it on COM:FR? There IMHO aren't much use cases for it left besides formatting for template uses or for simulating a scanned book as described in that footnote, except when the actual uploader is requesting a renaming as FR#4 where they could very well also have used FR#1. As I see it, the bread an butter business in renaming would only be the criteria FR#2 and FR#3, the remainder (including FR#1!) should warrant a deeper scrutiny when encountering it, and doing name changes by one's own discretion should be limited to the criteria 2 (meaningless name), 3 (obvious error) and perhaps 5 (rule violation). Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 00:30, 9 February 2026 (UTC)