Jump to content

Commons:Featured picture candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Shortcut
This project page in other languages:

Other featured candidates

   📽️ Media

Skip to current candidates Skip to current candidates

Featured picture candidates

Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures.

Old candidates for featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026 and current month.

For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election.

Formal things

Nominating

Guidelines for nominators

Please read the complete guidelines before nominating.

This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:

  • Licensing – Images licensed with solely "GFDL" or "GFDL and an NC-only license" are not acceptable due the restrictions placed on re-use by these licenses.
  • Resolution – Raster images of lower resolution than 2 million pixels (pixels, not bytes) are typically rejected unless there are strong mitigating reasons. This does not apply to vector graphics (SVGs).
    • Graphics on Commons are not only viewed on conventional computer screens. They may be used in high-resolution print versions, and the images may be cropped to focus on portions of the image. See Commons:Why we need high resolution media for more information.
  • Scans – While not official policy, Help:Scanning provides advice on the preparation of various types of images that may be useful.
  • General quality – pictures being nominated should be of high technical quality.
  • Digital manipulations must not deceive the viewer. Digital manipulation for the purpose of correcting flaws in an image is generally acceptable, provided it is limited, well-done, and not intended to deceive.
    • For photographs, typical acceptable manipulations include cropping, perspective correction, sharpening/blurring, and color/exposure correction. More extensive manipulations, such as removal of distracting background elements, should be clearly described in the image text, by means of the {{Retouched picture}} template. Undescribed or mis-described manipulations which cause the main subject to be misrepresented are never acceptable. For images made from more than one photo, you can use the {{Panorama}} or {{Focus stacked image}} templates.
    • For historic images, acceptable manipulations might include digitally fixing rips, removal of stains, cleanup of dirt, and, for mass-produced artworks such as engravings, removal of flaws inherent to the particular reproduction, such as over-inking. Careful color adjustments may be used to bring out the original work from the signs of ageing, though care should be taken to restore a natural appearance. The original artistic intent should be considered when deciding whether it is appropriate to make a change. Edits to historic material should be documented in detail within the file description, and an unedited version should be uploaded and cross linked for comparison.
  • Value – our main goal is to feature most valuable pictures from all others. Pictures should be in some way special, so please be aware that:
    • almost all sunsets are aesthetically pleasing, and most such pictures are not in essence different from others,
    • night-shots are pretty but normally more details can be shown on pictures taken at daytime,
    • beautiful does not always mean valuable.
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documents

There are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject.

Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable.

Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself.

Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well.

Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:

  • Notable in its own right: Works by major artists, or works that are otherwise notable, such as the subjects of a controversy.
  • Of high artistic merit: Works which, while not particularly well known, are nonetheless wonderful examples of their particular type or school of art.
  • Of high historic merit: The historical method values very early illustrations of scenes and events over later ones. Hence, a work of poor quality depicting a contemporaneous historical event can be nonetheless important, even if the artistic merit is relatively low. Likewise, scans or photographs of important documents – which may not be at all artistic – nonetheless may be highly valuable if the documents are historically significant. The reason for the image's historical importance should be briefly stated in the nomination, for those reviewers unfamiliar with the subject.
  • Of high illustrative merit: Works that illustrate or help explain notable subjects, for instance, illustrations of books, scientific subjects, or technical processes. The amount of artistic merit required for these will vary by subject, but, for instance, an illustration that makes the working of a complicated piece of machinery very clear need not be notable as a piece of artwork as well, whereas an illustration for a book might well be expected to reach much higher artistic standards.

Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced."

Photographs

On the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.

  • Focus – every important object in the picture should normally be sharp.
  • Exposure refers to the shutter diaphragm combination that renders an image with a tonal curve that ideally is able to represent in acceptable detail shadows and highlights within the image. This is called latitude. Images can be on the low side of the tonal curve (low range), the middle (middle range) or high side (upper range). Lack of shadow detail is not necessarily a negative characteristic. In fact, it can be part of the desired effect. Burned highlights in large areas are a distracting element.
  • Composition refers to the arrangement of the elements within the image. The "Rule of thirds" is one useful guideline. Horizons should almost never be placed in the middle, where they "cut" the image in half. Often, a horizon creating a top or bottom third of the space works better. The main idea is to use space to create a dynamic image.
    • Foreground and background – foreground and background objects may be distracting. You should check that something in front of the subject doesn't hide important elements and that something in background doesn't spoil the composition (for example that the streetlight doesn't "stand" on someone's head).
  • Movement control refers to the manner in which motion is represented in the image. Motion can be frozen or blurred. Neither one is better than the other. It is the intention of representation. Movement is relative within the objects of the image. For example, photographing a race car that appears frozen in relation to the background does not give us a sense of speed or motion, so technique dictates to represent the car in a frozen manner but with a blurred background, thus creating the sense of motion, this is called "panning". On the other hand, representing a basketball player in a high jump frozen in relation to everything else, due to the "unnatural" nature of the pose would be a good photograph.
  • Depth of field (DOF) refers to the area in focus in front of and beyond main subject. Depth of field is chosen according to the specific needs of every picture. Large or small DOF can either way add or subtract to the quality of the image. Low depth of field can be used to bring attention to the main subject, separating it from the general environment. High depth of field can be used to emphasize space. Short focal length lenses (wide angles) yield large DOF, and vice versa, long focal lenses (telephotos) have shallow DOF. Small apertures yield large DOF and conversely, large apertures yield shallow DOF.

On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.

  • Shape refers to the contour of the main subjects.
  • Volume refers to the three dimensional quality of the object. This is accomplished using side light. Contrary to general belief, front lighting is not the best light. It tends to flatten subject. Best light of day is early morning or late afternoon.
  • Color is important. Oversaturated colors are not good.
  • Texture refers to the quality of the surface of the subject. It is enhanced by side lighting… it is the "feel" to the touch.
  • Perspective refers to the "angle" accompanied by lines that disappear into a vanishing point that may or may not be inside the image.
  • Balance refers to the arrangement of subjects within the image that can either give equal weight or appear to be heavier on one side.
  • Proportion refers to the relation of size of objects in picture. Generally, we tend to represent small objects small in relation to others, but a good technique is to represent small objects large contrary to natural size relationship. For example, a small flower is given preponderance over a large mountain…. This is called inversion of scales.
Not all elements must be present. Some photographs can be judged on individual characteristics, that is, an image can be about color or texture, or color AND texture, etc.
  • Noise refers to unwanted corruption of color brightness and quality and can be caused by underexposure. It is not a desirable quality and can be grounds for opposition.
  • Symbolic meaning or relevance … Opinion wars can begin here … A bad picture of a very difficult subject is better than a good picture of an ordinary subject. A good picture of a difficult subject is an extraordinary photograph.
Images can be culturally biased by the photographer and/or the observer. The meaning of the image should be judged according to the cultural context of the image, not by the cultural context of the observer. An image "speaks" to people, and it has the capacity to evoke emotion such as tenderness, rage, rejection, happiness, sadness, etc. Good photographs are not limited to evoking pleasant sensations …

You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating.

Video and audio

Please nominate videos, sounds, music, PDFs, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates.

Set nominations

If a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:

  • Faithful digital reproductions of works notable in their own right, which the original author clearly intended to be viewed as a set. Examples: pages in a pamphlet, crops (puzzle pieces) of a prohibitively large scan, a pair of pendant paintings. Not acceptable: Arbitrary selection of sample works by an artist.
  • A sequence of images showing the passage of time. They could depict frames of a moving/changing object or a static object during different times of day or different seasons. Examples: diagrams illustrating a process, steps of a dance, metamorphosis of an insect, maps/drawings/photos of the same subject over the years (frame of view should be more or less the same).
  • A group of images depicting the same subject from different viewpoints, preferably taken under the same lighting conditions when possible. Examples: Exterior and interior of a building, different facades of a building, different interior views, obverse and inverse of a banknote/coin. Not acceptable: A selection of different rooms in a skyscraper, the facade of a church plus an organ, any images of fundamentally different scopes.
  • A group of images which show all possible variations of a particular class of object. Examples: Male and female versions of an animal (preferably in the same setting), all known species of a genus. Not acceptable: A few breeds of cats (unless they share a defining characteristic and represent all possible examples of that).


Adding a new nomination

If you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate name, quality, image description, categories and licensing, then do the following.

Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button.

All single files:

For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2

All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".


Step 2: follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save that page.

Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg}}

Nominations are time-sensitive and for one-time use only. An automatic clock starts as soon as they are created. Do not create them in advance, save them for later or re-activate them.

Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports An image will only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.

Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using {{subst:FPC-notice|Your image filename.jpg}} -- ~~~~.

Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. They should be added by, or at the request of, the nominator.

An 'Alternative' is created by adding a sub-section to the nomination page: ====Alternative==== [[File:Foo.jpg|300px]] *{{info}} A short description.

Voting

Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 100 constructive, stable edits on Commons (excluding user and talk pages) can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed.

You may use the following templates:

  • {{Support}} ( Support),
  • {{Oppose}} ( Oppose),
  • {{Neutral}} ( Neutral),
  • {{Comment}} ( Comment),
  • {{Info}} ( Info),
  • {{Question}} ( Question),
  • {{Request}} ( Request).

You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator.

A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above.

Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:

  • No reason
  • "I don't like it" and other empty assessments
  • "You can do better" and other criticisms of the author/nominator rather than the image

Remember also to put your signature (~~~~).

Over time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:

Text to use Displays as Meaning
{{Keep}}  Keep It deserves to remain a featured picture.
{{Delist}}  Delist It does not deserve to be a featured picture anymore.

This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:

Text to use Displays as Meaning
{{Keep}}  Keep Do not replace the old image with the new image as a FP.
{{Delistandreplace}}  Delist and replace Replace the current FP with the proposed replacement.

If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box:


In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:

  • Information on the origin of the image (creator, uploader);
  • A link to the original FP nomination (it will appear under "Links" on the image description page);
  • Your reasons for nominating the image and your username.

After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list.

As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose.

General rules

  1. The voting period is 9 complete days counted from the nomination. After the end of this period the result will be determined. Votes added on day 10 and after are not counted.
  2. Nominations by anonymous contributors are welcome.
  3. Contributions to discussion by anonymous contributors are welcome.
  4. Only registered contributors whose Commons accounts have at least 10 days and 100 constructive, stable edits on Commons (excluding user and talk pages) can vote. Exception: registered users can always vote in their own nominations no matter the account age and number of edits.
  5. Nominations do not count as votes. Support must be explicitly stated.
  6. Nominators and authors can withdraw their nominated pictures at any time. This is done by adding the following template: {{Withdraw}} ~~~~. Also, remember that if more than one version is nominated, you should explicitly state which version you are withdrawing.
  7. Remember, the goal of the Wikimedia Commons project is to provide a central repository for free images to be used by all Wikimedia projects, including possible future projects. This is not simply a repository for Wikipedia images, so images should not be judged here on their suitability for that project.
  8. Rules of the 5th day based on vote counts on day number 5 (day of nomination + 5):
    1. Pictures are speedy declined if they have fewer than two support votes.
    2. Pictures are speedy promoted if they have 10 support votes or more and no oppose votes. (Note that if it takes more than five days to reach this threshold, the picture can be promoted as soon as it is reached.) This does not apply to nominations containing at least one ‘Alternative’ image – because it is possible that another image can overtake the one in the lead during the last days, such nominations are never closed early.
    3. Once either speedy criterion is reached, the voting period is considered closed, and no more votes may be added.
  9. Pictures tagged {{FPX}} may be removed from the list 24 hours after the tag was applied, provided there are no support votes other than that of the nominator.
  10. Pictures tagged {{FPD}} (FP-Denied) may be removed from the list 24 hours after the tag was applied.
  11. Only two active nominations by the same user (that is, nominations under review and not yet closed) are allowed. The main purpose of this measure is to contribute to a better average quality of nominations, by driving nominators/creators to choose carefully the pictures presented to the forum.

Featuring and delisting rules

A candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:

  1. Appropriate license (of course)
  2. At least seven  Support votes (or 7  Delist votes for a delist) at the end of nine days
  3. Ratio of supporting/opposing votes at least 2/1 (a two-thirds majority); same for delist/keep votes
  4. Two different versions of the same picture cannot both be featured, but only the one with higher level of support, as determined by the closer. Whenever the closer is not sure which version has consensus to be featured, they should attempt to contact the voters to clarify their opinions if not clear from the nomination page.
  5. Only two active delisting nominations per user, which is in addition to the limit of two active regular nominations.

The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5.

The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules.

Above all, be polite

Please don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care.

Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken.

See also

Table of contents

List may contain works considered Not Safe for Work (nudity).

Nominators are requested, out of courtesy, to include the {{Nsfw}} template with such images. Users may select the gadget in user preferences "Deferred display of images tagged with {{Nsfw}} on COM:FPC" to enable the template's effect of hiding the image until selected.

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
⚠️ Important notice ⚠️
A vote is currently underway to decide whether the FPC promotion rules should be changed by requiring more than seven votes for an image to be promoted and/or by increasing the required support ratio above 2:1.

All users eligible to vote on FPC are invited to vote on this page.

This temporary notice will be removed after the vote is over.
⚠️ Important notice ⚠️
An anonymous survey is underway to gain insights on the current FPC process.

All users eligible to vote on FPC are invited to participate here.

This temporary notice will be removed after the survey is closed.
Shortcut

File:Gorila de montaña (Gorilla beringei beringei), parque nacional de la Selva Impenetrable de Bwindi, Uganda, 2024-02-02, DD 51.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Feb 2026 at 11:44:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Silverback mountain gorilla (Gorilla beringei beringei) playing with a gorilla baby, Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda.

File:101 African bush elephant face close-up in Etosha National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Feb 2026 at 08:07:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

African bush elephant face close-up in Etosha National Park

File:Changing of the guard Ala-Too Square, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Feb 2026 at 18:08:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Changing of the guard Ala-Too Square, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan

File:Mute swan (Cygnus olor) cygnet Denmark.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Feb 2026 at 22:32:26 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mute swan (Cygnus olor) cygnet

File:Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) chick Denmark.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Feb 2026 at 22:31:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) chick

File:Estádio Governador Magalhães Pinto - Belo Horizonte - 20250409150611.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Feb 2026 at 21:29:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Drohobych, Saint Bartholomew church, P1010768.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Feb 2026 at 19:37:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Interior of Saint Bartholomew church, Drohobych, Ukraine. July 2022.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Ukraine
  •  Info Interior of Saint Bartholomew church, Drohobych, Ukraine. July 2022. Created by Posterrr – uploaded by Posterrr – nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 19:37, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- Zquid (talk) 19:37, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Interesting picture. I sort of feel for FP, the Latin inscription should at least be transcribed in the file description, so that people can easily copy and paste it into a translation program or site, and better yet, also translated into a modern language. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:10, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • QUE INTRA HANC ECCLESIAM COLLAPSA AUT РАМКА ERANT, FA AD1790. AD. SOLİDAM FİRMİ TATEMASUBTE LEM VEN STATEM DISPOSITA ORNATA CONSPICIUNTUR. My Latin is bad enough to deduce something to the effect of 'that which was within this church collapsed 1790. They are now rebuilt solidly and firmly' Machine translation gives "Those things which within this church had collapsed or were in ruins, before 1790, are now seen to have been set in place, arranged, and adorned upon a solid and firm foundation." JayCubby (talk) 17:07, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    I meant for it to be added to the file description. It looks like User:Posterrr's last contribution was in January of 2025, though, so I can add this, but someone who knows Ukrainian should add a Ukrainian translation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:40, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barred Ground Dove (Geopelia striata) - Mahe - Seychelles - 05.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Feb 2026 at 18:45:13 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Barred Ground Dove (Geopelia striata)

File:Tagetes patula flower and foliage, Dhaka, Bangladesh 02.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Feb 2026 at 17:00:19 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Црква „Св. Преображение“ - Буково 17.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Feb 2026 at 14:46:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

An inscription in the niche on the western side of Church of the Transfiguration of the Bukovo Monastery

File:005 Rufescent tiger heron in Encontro das Águas State Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Feb 2026 at 09:18:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rufescent tiger heron in Encontro das Águas State Park

File:Common kingfisher, Tennōji Park, February 2026 - 0162.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Feb 2026 at 00:22:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Common kingfisher, Tennōji Park, February 2026

File:Library Congress October 2016-2a.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2026 at 20:30:11 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Great Hall Library of Congress, Washington DC
 Comment There's no nomination page?!? If you take a closer look at the pictures in this category, you can only get a vague impression of how striking the architecture is and how spectacular the richness of detail in the design is. It is impossible to capture this in a single image. Based on the selected section, I would support the nomination, but I am not satisfied with the technical quality. The focus is very clearly on the ceiling in the background, and the corners and edges are quite blurred. I cannot assess this more accurately due to the lack of data on the shooting configuration. Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 06:40, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@ There's no nomination page?!?: ✓ Done – there was a little mistake in the name of the nomination subpage. – Aristeas (talk) 08:55, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
 Info @Syntaxys: The Exif info was deleted by the (free) denoising application, and I could not fill in the most important parameters. Here they are: F5, 1/25, ISO 640. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alvesgaspar (talk • contribs) 10:41, 8. Feb. 2026 (UTC)
That's what I expected, and I guess you couldn't use a tripod either. Could you please also tell us the camera and lens model? --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 06:34, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Info Nikon D800E, Sigma 24-105 mm (at 35mm). -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:00, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
     Neutral Thanks very much for that information. Well, the shooting conditions for this photo were certainly not easy, but I would have closed the aperture further to improve the sharpness at the edges and corners. The D800E still has good noise performance even at ISO 1600, and with the image stabilizer of the lens used, you can maintain an exposure time of 1/20 s at 35 mm. But sometimes I also think, “Damn, why didn't I photograph that differently?”
    I don't want to vote against this nomination, as the image has a high educational value and is unique in terms of content in this category. But unfortunately, I don't see any particular wow factor due to the lack of sharpness in the main area. The fact that the outer lunettes are cropped also does not benefit the overall impression. Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 15:24, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zirm sun sas te Ncisles Gherdeina.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2026 at 16:41:02 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Swiss pine tree (pinus cembra) on the Ncisles pasture with the Odles Puez-Geisler Nature Park, Dolomites UNESCO World Heritage Site.

File:Portrait einer männlichen Eiderente (Somateria mollissima) auf Norderney.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2026 at 14:07:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Portrait of a male common eider

File:Phelsuma grandis, Mauritius.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2026 at 13:27:01 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Alt

Phelsuma grandis, Mauritius (edited)

  •  Support Since -Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys opniion, wich i support, i tried to make gecko body better visible due smaller tree, it could go more, but some "real" size where left hand could be placed. I also removed noise, some sharpening too and color in bottom triangle-background. This option is maybe even better. --Mile (talk) 14:20, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Good work, keep as other version, but I prefer the original (alternative looks too distorted and artificial). The file from Flickr also here, but sadly the nose is out of focus, so unlikely to pass. Юрий Д.К. 14:37, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support I prefer this crop - thanks for the alternative, Mile. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:05, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:21, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Question You artificially decreased the diameter of the twig? Why do you think that's OK? I'm likely to oppose but want to hear you out. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:25, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Oops - I initially did not notice that the twig had been artificially narrowed. That is my mistake, and thanks to Ikan for the attentive observation. The composition initially gave the impression of a different crop, which is why I didn't notice the alteration at first. @Mile: If such alterations are made, they should be transparently documented on the file page, ideally using the {{Retouched picture}} template. Under these circumstances, I withdraw my support and move it to the original version. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:28, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Yes Ikan, Radomianin, its written in Description what did i make. And its more generous than "Retouche" icon, saying you nothing much. Ikan per your question actually Radomianin 1st vote explained you, that he like this more. Of course if they would be put togehther i am more sure this would gave better voting. Would be interesting to see which one would be used more. Why is OK ? See comment from Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys. --Mile (talk) 17:31, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you very much for the clarification, Mile. I fully support using the {{Retouched picture}} template, as it transparently documents the edits and automatically places the image in Category:Retouched pictures. Sorry, I hadn't initially noticed the reduced twig, but I truly appreciate the care and skill you put into enhancing the image. On reflection, I am in favor of the original version, as it shows the twig in its natural appearance. The reduction does not seem appropriate for a featured picture. I've just added the template to the file page. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 23:10, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fluweelpootje, (Flammulina velutipes), 22-01-2026. (d.j.b.). 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2026 at 05:28:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Butterpilz (Rhodocollybia butyracea) Bruderwald-20251101-RM-155917.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Feb 2026 at 23:09:42 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Butter mushroom (Rhodocollybia butyracea) in the Bruderwald forest
  •  Comment t's often impossible to identify mushrooms accurately from a photo because you can't smell or touch them. Unfortunately, I'm only a photographer, not a mushroom expert.--Ermell (talk) 15:00, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cecil Beaton Photographs- Political and Military Personalities; Durri Shehvar, Princess IB783.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Feb 2026 at 22:01:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Princess Durri Shehvar Berar, only daughter of the former Sultan of Turkey, photographed wearing a jewelled sari in India

File:Black-bellied Tern in Satkosia Tiger Reserve December 2024 by Tisha Mukherjee 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2026 at 16:57:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Black-bellied Tern (Sterna acuticauda)

Alternative

File:Miniaturenpark Kleiner Harz - Schloss Wernigerode 06.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2026 at 13:36:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Model in 1:25 scale of the Wernigerode Castle with the Original in the background

File:Ed Maier's Secret - near Buckskin Gulch, Utah.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2026 at 10:30:24 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Hassan Tower Columns Rabat Nov25 A7CR 08839.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2026 at 09:12:18 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hassan Tower with columns of mosque, Rabat, Morocco
I'm still considering whether to support. This version definitely looks cleaner, but I regret the deletion of the birds. They're not dust spots but were part of the scene. A thing I'm thinking about is the cranes, but I'm not asking you to clone them out. At a certain point, with everything cloned out, a digitally-edited photo becomes a fantasy. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:41, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Ikan Kekek and Crisco 1492: Thanks for the reviews. I've restored the tiny birds in flight above the tower. --Tagooty (talk) 15:21, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2026 at 02:23:09 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Little cormorant in Keoladeo National Park
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 07:13, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Phalacrocoracidae (Cormorants)

Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2026 at 21:25:03 (UTC)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page

  • Front view
    Front view
  • Side view
    Side view
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 07:15, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish#Family : Balistidae (Triggerfish)

File:Црква „Св. Екатерина“ - Стенче 3.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2026 at 20:02:41 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

St. Catherine Church (left) with the bell tower (right) of the Stenče Monastery

File:Brückenturm der Nibelungenbrücke in Worms (Westseite).jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2026 at 15:29:51 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bridge tower of the Nibelungen bridge in Worms, west facade

File:Estátua do Laçador supermoon (black and white).jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2026 at 14:31:40 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Laçador statue, a monument in the city of Porto Alegre, being illuminated by the supermoon, in black and white.

* Weak support per Arion. Юрий Д.К. 12:01, 5 February 2026 (UTC)´[reply]

  •  Comment I wonder if the last three reviewers are aware of the fact that a "Weak support" has exactly the same effect as a full support vote. Which means that this picture is not far from being considered as part of the best Commons has to offer. Still, not long ago, it would have been quickly FPXed because of its poor quality. Please note that there is no historical value or special circumstances around this shot, and that the subject is still there, waiting for a better photo. I also wonder why most of the regulars, some of them excellent photographers, have chosen to look the other way. Should I remind all that FPC is about pictures, not authors or countries? This is what I have called, in a recent discussion, a climate of intimidation. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:21, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    "this picture is not far from being considered as part of the best Commons has to offer", this is your opinion. There's no need to try to convince those who already supported the photo. heylenny (talk/edits) 13:29, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • The accusation of Canvassing is a serious one and should not be made lightly. Could you please provide solid evidence that it took place (or apologize, instead)? -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:48, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    Coming back here after the photo received support and "warning" users who gave weak support sounds very strange. Let us not doubt the competence of these users, who certainly know what they are doing in this project and know what a "weak support" is. Please reserve the right to only evaluate the photo and nothing more. heylenny (talk/edits) 13:57, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    What's the problem with the votes? Composition is FP and it can be a mitigating factor. ★ 20:58, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Thank you for your comments, Alvesgaspar and Heylenny. I particularly appreciate the attention to technical aspects - diverse perspectives always enrich the discussion. As noted in the guidelines "Given sufficient "wow factor" and mitigating circumstances, a featured picture is permitted to fall short on technical quality", a featured picture may be accepted even if it has some technical shortcomings. Every reviewer's vote reflects their own judgment, and together they represent the community's eye for composition and expression. In this category, this image currently appears to me as the strongest in terms of composition. I hope we can continue to focus on the image itself and appreciate the variety of perspectives that make FPC discussions so valuable. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 14:18, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    Agreed. Thank you for this comment. About the category, I also think, in terms of composition, this is the best one. I also like this one from 1999, but I don't think it will be accepted as a FP today. heylenny (talk/edits) 14:22, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • This image is expressive - the grain appears to be natural film grain and should be preserved, with only minor blemishes retouched. In terms of resolution, it is just below the 2 MP minimum, so unfortunately it would not qualify as an FP candidate. It could potentially be reconsidered if the original film material were available for a new high-resolution scan, but given that the author has been inactive since 2012, this would be a high-effort solution. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 14:39, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Changed to full support. Agree with Arion about quality but compo is fine. Also I haven't noticed that the image has been taken during supermoon. Юрий Д.К. 16:13, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support I don’t care. We need more out-of-the-box pictures! – Aristeas (talk) 10:29, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose This is a good idea poorly executed. I like the contre-jour with the moon, the composition, and the choice of black-and-white. But the statue is soft, there is heavy posterisation, and the tonal transitions are abrupt. But perhaps what bugs me the most is the light coming from the right, illuminating the right arm and taking attention away from the face --Julesvernex2 (talk) 20:05, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • ✓ Suggested improvements I have made an edit in which I improved the sharpness of the statue and tried to reduce the banding in the surrounding areas as much as possible. The image is available for direct preview via the Google Drive link, as well as a direct download link via SwissTransfer for the uploadable JPG and the editable PSD file for those interested. The Photoshop layers have been named in English to ensure maximum transparency and clarity of the edits for anyone wishing to review them. @Heylenny: If you like the edit, it can be freely used for an update. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 22:45, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • ✓ Done Thank you! I have uploaded the improved version, added the retouch template, and refined the derivative/source information. If you think it's useful, you might consider pinging the previous reviewers. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 00:05, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pez payaso rosado (Amphiprion perideraion), Anilao, Filipinas, 2023-08-25, DD 101.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2026 at 20:49:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pink skunk clownfish (Amphiprion perideraion), Anilao, Philippines
  • I can double check the WB but it looks fine to me. This speices of clownfish is completely different to all others (and also the reason of this nom). Colours are of course affected by the depth, that's one of the reasons why I always use lights. --Poco a poco (talk) 15:03, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Victor Meirelles - Rua João Pinto, antiga Rua Augusta.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2026 at 17:50:49 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

João Pinto Street, formerly Augusta Street, in the city of Desterro

File:Sagrada Familia March 2015-19bw.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2026 at 15:33:09 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Stairway in Sagrada Familia cathedral

File:Lupinus pilosus - Flowers Kfar Shemaryahu 2023-02-11 IZE-098.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2026 at 12:19:11 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lupinus pilosus

File:Bob Dylan 1963 promo photo by Don Hunstein.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2026 at 10:20:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bob Dylan, 1963 promo photo by Don Hunstein

File:Pad van Andiast-Breil-Brigels. 24-09-2025. (actm.) 04.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2026 at 06:30:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION


Alternative

File:Atrium and ceiling at AEON MALL, February 2026 - 3010.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Feb 2026 at 13:35:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Atrium and ceiling at AEON MALL
✓ Fixed The sharpening filter was the cause. Disabling sharpening fixed the issue. --Laitche (talk) 22:53, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maybe (51084870).jpeg

Voting period ends on 11 Feb 2026 at 09:08:02 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Black and White image of a man deep in thought
  •  Comment Thank you very much for looking into this and for sharing the information - much appreciated, JayCubby. However, identifying a person in an image based solely on face search results is not sufficient on Commons. Since the subject is, in all likelihood, a private individual rather than a public figure, such indirect identification methods are not considered acceptable. Without a reliable source explicitly linking this specific photograph to a named person, it would therefore not be appropriate to include a name in the description. In my view, it is safer and more policy-compliant to keep the subject anonymous and focus on the photographic qualities of the image. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 16:41, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    Indeed. Hricko is a self-described street photographer, so the subject's identity is of course irrelevant. JayCubby (talk) 17:27, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Weak support A great, very expressive photo. If this is an anonymous shot and the man is not known by name, that’s no problem. Once the nomination has been successfully completed, please give the file a more descriptive name. The weak support is solely due to the relatively small file size (2.9 MP). -- Radomianin (talk) 11:40, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose - No valid reason that I see to the small picture size and the absence of information about the shot. The impression (forgive me if I am wrong) is that the picture was dumped here. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:08, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Question Thank you for your comment, Alvesgaspar. Could you please clarify what you mean by the impression that the image was "dumped here"? From my point of view, the nomination itself does not seem unusual - contributors are free to nominate images they find compelling, and FPC provides the space to discuss their merits and limitations. I agree that more information about the shot would be useful if available, but I would not interpret the nomination as problematic in itself. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 16:55, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    @Radomianin, 500px dropped support for CC licenses. Commons archived all CC'd photos. See Commons:500px licensing data JayCubby (talk) 17:50, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Thank you so much for the clarification, JayCubby - I really appreciate you taking the time to explain the context. I wasn't aware, that this file is part of the controlled 500px CC archive import project. I also just noticed the deletion discussion, which was closed with positive consensus. Understanding that the file comes from this carefully managed archival effort helps explain why it may appear less contextualised than individually curated uploads. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 18:15, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Weak support Honestly I do not get the point of some comments here. This is street photography and a portrait, and we must assert it as such. It’s irrelevant for FPC that the image has been imported from 500px as long as that import was legal (AFAICS it was); legal imports from 500px are not more problematic than Flickr imports, on the contrary I would say that their average image quality is certainly much better than the average Flickr image quality. There are some valid points we can discuss, of course. Maybe the image is too small (not enough pixels). Maybe there are legal problems with the privacy of the man in the photograph (any insights here?). Maybe some of us say it just doesn’t wow them (OK!). IMHO we should discuss such points and vote according to our assessment of them. For me the image is an impressive casual portrait; it appears very authentic and likeable and makes me want to make the man’s acquaintance (for me that’s always a big plus for a portrait – many recognized portraits of stars, politicians and industrialists rather give me the impression that I do not need to know them ;–)). Sharpness, contrast etc. are fine. It’s just a bit small, probably cropped, maybe also scaled down. I would say the resolution is still adequate, therefore I vote with weak support. – Aristeas (talk) 20:53, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Thinking. I dont like crop; first his hand-fingers choped. Background of left is not so good - too much white, so wise-man is not isolated so good. And one mistake crop of man in border. I think he could be in photo complete, to make two man seating and idling. At the end-size. --Mile (talk) 10:52, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
     Comment Now that’s a fair and well-founded oppose vote, thank you. – Aristeas (talk) 15:31, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Mile's objections are valid, but the man's expression is so unusual and striking, and this is a high-quality portrait, regardless of the size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:08, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:21, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support per Ikan Kekek --heylenny (talk/edits) 15:35, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:20220611 Dactylorhiza 04.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Feb 2026 at 11:38:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

inflorescence of a Common Spotted Orchid with Eusphalerum luteum in the Pupplinger Au, Germany

Chestnut-bellied Sandgrouse

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Feb 2026 at 08:09:10 (UTC)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page

  • Pterocles exustus (Chestnut-bellied Sandgrouse) male
    Pterocles exustus (Chestnut-bellied Sandgrouse) male
  • Pterocles exustus (Chestnut-bellied Sandgrouse) female
    Pterocles exustus (Chestnut-bellied Sandgrouse) female

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Feb 2026 at 03:17:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Interior view of the front of the Missions ruins.
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 07:14, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]


Timetable (day 5 after nomination)

Thu 05 Feb → Tue 10 Feb
Fri 06 Feb → Wed 11 Feb
Sat 07 Feb → Thu 12 Feb
Sun 08 Feb → Fri 13 Feb
Mon 09 Feb → Sat 14 Feb
Tue 10 Feb → Sun 15 Feb

Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)

Sun 01 Feb → Tue 10 Feb
Mon 02 Feb → Wed 11 Feb
Tue 03 Feb → Thu 12 Feb
Wed 04 Feb → Fri 13 Feb
Thu 05 Feb → Sat 14 Feb
Fri 06 Feb → Sun 15 Feb
Sat 07 Feb → Mon 16 Feb
Sun 08 Feb → Tue 17 Feb
Mon 09 Feb → Wed 18 Feb
Tue 10 Feb → Thu 19 Feb

Closing nominations manually

The following description explains how to close nominations manually. Normally this is not necessary, as FPCBot takes care of counting the votes, closing and archiving the nominations. When the Bot has counted the votes, a user needs to check and approve the result; everything else is done by the Bot. Therefore, the following instructions are normally only needed for delist-and-replace nominations that the Bot cannot (yet) process, and in case the Bot malfunctions. The closing can be done by any experienced user. If you need help, just ask on the FPC talk page.

  1. On Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the nomination, then [edit].
    • Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
      {{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=(“yes” or “no”)|gallery=xxx|sig=~~~~}}
      (You can leave the gallery parameter blank if the image was not featured. If the nomination contains alternatives, you must add the alternative=xxx parameter with the name of the selected image between the gallery and the sig parameter. See {{FPC-results-reviewed}} for examples and more explanations.)
    • Edit the title of the nomination and add featured or not featured after the link – for example:
      === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
      becomes
      === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured ===
    • Save your edit.
  2. If it is featured:
    1. Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
    2. Add the picture to the appropriate featured picture gallery page and section. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images on Commons:Featured pictures, list to find the gallery page, and search for the correct section. (An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.)
    3. Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
      • If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the com-nom parameter. For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted in the nomination Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}} You also need the com-nom parameter if the image gets renamed.
      • If the image is already featured on another Wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the {{Assessments}} template. For instance, {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
    4. Head over to the structured data for the image and add the “Commons quality assessment” claim (P6731) “Wikimedia Commons featured picture” (Q63348049).
    5. Add the picture to the chronological archives of featured pictures. Place it at the end of the gallery using this format:
      File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Title'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|xxx}}, {{o|xxx}}, {{n|xxx}}
      • The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other entries on that page for examples. (If you want to do everything perfectly, link that number to the nomination subpage, just like FPCBot does this. It allows users to jump directly to the nomination.)
      • The Title should be replaced by the bare name of the featured picture, without the ‘File:’ or the file extension (such as .jpg .tif .svg).
      • The x in {{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}} should be replaced by the count of support, oppose, and neutral votes respectively.
      • If the nomination was a set nomination, use this format:
        File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Set: Title (Z files)'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}}
        Replace the Z in (Z files) by the count of images in the set, and use the name of the first image from the set instead of File:xxxxx.jpg and for the title.
    6. Add == FP promotion ==
      {{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the nominator. For set nominations, use:
      == Set Promoted to FP ==
      <gallery>
      File:XXXXXX.jpg
      File:XXXXXX.jpg
      </gallery>
      {{FPpromotionSet2|YYYYY}}      , using the names of the set files instead of the XXXXXX and the title of the set instead of YYYYY.
    7. Add == FP promotion ==
      {{FPpromotedUploader|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the user who has uploaded the image, if that user is not the same as the nominator.
    8. Add == FP promotion ==
      {{FPpromotedCreator|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the creator, if the author is a different Commons user than nominator and uploader.
  3. As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}-d, {{FPD}}-d and {{Withdraw}}-n nominations), you have to move the transclusion (the {{ }} and the text within those) of the nomination to the current log page.
    • To find the current log page, visit the first page of the log for this month. If the header of that page contains a link with the text “Next part of this month”, the log for this month has been split into several parts because it contains too many entries. Click on the “Next part …” link and repeat this until you reach a page where the header does not offer a “Next part …” link; that’s the last and current log page.
    • Now open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you are closing. It will be of the form: {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}} or: {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/XXXXX}}.
    • Copy that line to the bottom of the current log page and save that page. Then remove the same line from the candidate list and save that page.

Closing a delisting nomination

  1. On Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
    {{FPC-delist-results-reviewed|delist=x|keep=x|neutral=x|delisted=yes/no|sig=~~~~}}
    (for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Ensifera ensifera (22271195865).jpg)
  2. Edit the title of the delisting nomination and add delisted or not delisted after the image title; for example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
    becomes
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted ===
  3. Move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.
  4. If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
    1. Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
    2. Edit the picture's description as follows:
    3. Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in the chronological archive of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1–6) with (1–6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture must not be removed from the chronological archives.
  5. If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the section above. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.

Archiving a withdrawn nomination

If a nomination has been withdrawn by the nominator by using {{Withdraw}} or is cancelled with {{FPX}} or {{FPD}}, wait 24 hours after the nomination was last edited. If there has been no objection to the cancellation within this time, the nomination can simply be archived. Just move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates&oldid=1144464229"